When do I need a Large-Backward fan instead of a normal backward fan?
When the installation forces a large-diameter, low-speed wheel — a noise limit, rotor-inertia or drive constraint, or a footprint that caps how fast the fan can turn — or when you need high static (to ~1,700 mmWC) at modest flow on a single large slow wheel. If size and speed are not your real constraint, a smaller backward family (the Backward-Curved Plate family, the Backward-Curved family) is more efficient and cheaper, and we will tell you so. This is a specialised large-format pick, not a default.
How much pressure has the Large-Backward family actually delivered?
Job-proven to 1,700 mmWC at modest flow on the large backward-curved wheel, with a software-validated ceiling of about 1,756 mmWC and readiness to engineer to 1,750 mmWC. That is high static on a single impeller, not a multi-stage build — within the 2,000 mmWC envelope. We size your duty into the stable region of the curve at the speed your installation allows.
How much power does the large wheel actually draw, and how do you size the motor?
We live-checked it rather than estimating. At envelope maximum the wheel absorbs 214 kW (287 BHP), and we select a 335 HP motor — within our 400 HP envelope — with headroom for the duty. The drive sizing is verified on our selection software, not carried over from a catalogue, so you are not paying for a motor that is wrong in either direction on a large, expensive drive.
Why is the efficiency lower than your other backward fans?
By design. Peak static efficiency sits below the smaller backward families (exact figures shared with your enquiry), because the wheel is optimised for large diameter and low speed — to fit the constraint and turn slowly — rather than for peak aerodynamic efficiency. You are buying the ability to make pressure at a constrained speed on a large quiet rotor. If running cost on clean air is the priority and size is not your constraint, the high-efficiency Aerofoil family or the Backward-Curved Plate workhorse is the better choice, and we will say so.
Can the Large-Backward fan handle dusty or abrasive gas?
No — it is a clean-duty family, built for clean or lightly dust-laden gas. The backward-curved blade erodes in particulate. Once dust becomes more than a light loading we move you to the high-dust Radial-Tip family, and for the dirtiest, most abrasive or product-laden gas in our range we use the wear-plated Radial family. Tell us the dust loading in g/m³ and we route you to the family that will actually survive the gas.
How do you handle and transport a 2-metre rotor?
We design large rotors split or sectioned for transport and field service, with crane handling and the large-machining steps engineered into the build SOP from the GA stage — not improvised at dispatch. Split SNL plummer-block bearings make the assembled fan maintainable in place. On a large rotor the stated balance grade and a witnessed run-test are where reliability is won, so we ship the balance report and FAT with the fan.
Do you performance-test before dispatch, and can we witness it?
Yes. Every fan is performance-tested in-house to the AMCA 210 / ISO 5801 method on our 200 HP VFD test rig, and dynamically balanced to ISO 21940 G6.3 as standard (G2.5 / G1.0 on application). On a large low-speed rotor we treat the balance grade and the run-test as the headline quality step. The test and FAT take about a week and are customer-witnessed on request — you see the curve and the balance report before the fan leaves the floor.
What about high temperature, CE and ATEX requirements?
The family is attested to 600 °C with high-temperature (HT) construction and served to 300 °C; above about 150 °C we fit a shaft cooling disc. Spark-resistant (SR) construction is available where the area classification requires it. To be precise on conformity: CE is self-declared per 2006/42/EC and 2014/35/EU, and ATEX Zone 2/22 is self-declared per 2014/34/EU (Category 3) — those are self-declarations of conformity, not third-party certifications. Our only third-party certification is ISO 9001:2015, and performance is tested to the AMCA 210 / ISO 5801 method in-house, not AMCA-certified.